Shared info of IoT & Cloud, Banking, Angular Wicket, Spring Microservices, BigData, flutter, E-comm, Java Telecomm and More

Showing posts with label Java Struts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Java Struts. Show all posts

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Struts2 AngularJS integration

In this post, we will learn to implement AJAX calls from a JSP page to a Struts 2 Action class using AngularJS and update the same JSP page back with the Json response from the Struts 2.

Library Required


Since Angular can send and receive only in json format, to handle it you need struts2-json-plugin-2.x.x.jar. This plugin allows you to serialize the Action class attribute which has getter and setter into a JSON object.

Struts2 AngularJS Insert Operation

LINK

As for the user interface, rather than Bootstrap, we'll use materialize CSS – a modern responsive front-end framework based mostly additionally on Google’s Material design.

FILE STRUCTURE

Knowing the file structure can offer us an outline of what Struts2 files can we need to create and wherever the assets should be placed.




Saturday, March 18, 2017

Comparsion: Struts 2 vs Spring 3 MVC

Apache Struts 2 and Spring MVC are two of the most popular Java web frameworks today. I’ve used both APIs extensively and wanted to share a quick comparison.
In Struts, the object that handles a request and routes it for processing is called an Action. In Spring MVC, that object is referred to as a Controller. Actions and Controllers are pretty much the same thing – they take input, process it, and return some sort of response.
The one major design difference is that by default, Struts 2 Actions are newly instantiated every time a request is made, whereas in Spring MVC the default behavior is to act as a Singleton. Spring MVC Controllers are created once and held in memory/shared across all requests. Note, you can change this behavior (scope) to request or session but we’ll talk about that later. This is a major difference to keep in mind when designing applications that need to be thread-safe, database oriented, or other share-able transactions.

Tuesday, November 29, 2016

Struts2 vs Struts1

1. Khái quát chung


2. Struts1


The framework just uses one instance of it and only one instance is used to process all incoming requests, care must be taken not to do something with in the Action class that is not thread safe. From the javadoc:
Actions must be programmed in a thread-safe manner, because the controller will share the same instance for multiple simultaneous requests. This means you should design with the following items in mind:
  1. Instance and static variables MUST NOT be used to store information related to the state of a particular request. They MAY be used to share global resources across requests for the same action.
  2. Access to other resources (JavaBeans, session variables, etc.) MUST be synchronized if those resources require protection. (Generally, however, resource classes should be designed to provide their own protection where necessary.

This is what the official Apache Struts page says :
Struts 1 Actions are singletons and must be thread-safe since there will only be one instance of a class to handle all requests for that Action. The singleton strategy places restrictions on what can be done with Struts 1 Actions and requires extra care to develop. Action resources must be thread-safe or synchronized.

3. Struts2




4. Tham khảo:

Struts 2 Architecture and Flow
Introduction to the Struts Web Framework
Overview of Struts
Struts document home
Struts Architecture and life-cycle
Struts1 document

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

Từ struts1 đến struts2

Struts 2: trying to combine the stability and accessibility of Struts 1 with the elegant architecture of WebWork 2. Since the initial incubation, the Struts 2 code has added major features including a plugin framework, a new API, and better Ajax tags..
  
Comparing Struts 1 and 2

Feature
Struts 1
Struts 2
Action classes
Struts 1 requires Action classes to extend an abstract base class. A common problem in Struts 1 is programming to abstract classes instead of interfaces.
An Struts 2 Action may implement an Action interface, along with other interfaces to enable optional and custom services. Struts 2 provides a base ActionSupport class to implement commonly used interfaces. Albeit, the Action interface is not required. Any POJO object with a execute signature can be used as an Struts 2 Action object.
Threading Model
Struts 1 Actions are singletons and must be thread-safe since there will only be one instance of a class to handle all requests for that Action. The singleton strategy places restrictions on what can be done with Struts 1 Actions and requires extra care to develop. Action resources must be thread-safe or synchronized.
Struts 2 Action objects are instantiated for each request, so there are no thread-safety issues. (In practice, servlet containers generate many throw-away objects per request, and one more object does not impose a performance penalty or impact garbage collection.)
Servlet Dependency
Struts 1 Actions have dependencies on the servlet API since the HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse is passed to the execute method when an Action is invoked.
Struts 2 Actions are not coupled to a container. Most often the servlet contexts are represented as simple Maps, allowing Actions to be tested in isolation. Struts 2 Actions can still access the original request and response, if required. However, other architectural elements reduce or eliminate the need to access the HttpServetRequest or HttpServletResponse directly.
Testability
A major hurdle to testing Struts 1 Actions is that the execute method exposes the Servlet API. A third-party extension, Struts TestCase, offers a set of mock object for Struts 1.
Struts 2 Actions can be tested by instantiating the Action, setting properties, and invoking methods. Dependency Injection support also makes testing simpler.
Harvesting Input
Struts 1 uses an ActionForm object to capture input. Like Actions, all ActionForms must extend a base class. Since  other JavaBeans cannot be used as ActionForms, developers often create redundant classes to capture input. DynaBeans can used as an alternative to creating conventional ActionForm classes, but, here too, developers may be redescribing existing JavaBeans. 
Struts 2 uses Action properties as input properties, eliminating the need for a second input object. Input properties may be rich object types which may have their own properties. The Action properties can be accessed from the web page via the taglibs. Struts 2 also supports the ActionForm pattern, as well as POJO form objects and POJO Actions. Rich object types, including business or domain objects, can be used as input/output objects. The ModelDriven feature simplifies taglb references to POJO input objects. 
Expression Language
Struts 1 integrates with JSTL, so it uses the JSTL EL. The EL has basic object graph traversal, but relatively weak collection and indexed property support.
Struts 2 can use JSTL, but the framework also supports a more powerful and flexible expression language called "Object Graph Notation Language" (OGNL).
Binding values into views
Struts 1 uses the standard JSP mechanism for binding objects into the page context for access.
Struts 2 uses a "ValueStack" technology so that the taglibs can access values without coupling your view to the object type it is rendering. The ValueStack strategy allows reuse of views across a range of types which may have the same property name but different property types. 
Type Conversion
Struts 1 ActionForm properties are usually all Strings. Struts 1 uses Commons-Beanutils for type conversion. Converters are per-class, and not configurable per instance.
Struts 2 uses OGNL for type conversion. The framework includes converters for basic and common object types and primitives.
Validation
Struts 1 supports manual validation via a validate method on the ActionForm, or through an extension to the Commons Validator. Classes can have different validation contexts for the same class, but cannot chain to validations on sub-objects.
Struts 2 supports manual validation via the validate method and the XWork Validation framework. The Xwork Validation Framework supports chaining validation into sub-properties using the validations defined for the properties class type and the validation context.
Control Of Action Execution
Struts 1 supports separate Request Processors (lifecycles) for each module, but all the Actions in the module must share the same lifecycle.
Struts 2 supports creating different lifecycles on a per Action basis via Interceptor Stacks. Custom stacks can be created and used with different Actions, as needed.


Migration Strategies
The migration strategy of Struts 1 developers moving to Struts 2 involves four non-exclusive paths:
1.     Dual processor, shared resources - Add the Struts 2.0 JARs to your exisitng Struts 1.3 application. Configure S2 to handle *.action requests s and
let S1 handle *.do requests.
S1 and S2 can run side by side, within the same web application. Teams can implement new features in the latest version, and migrate older pieces as needed. Optionally, some common resources may be shared between S1 and S2, like messages, validation rules, and Tiles configurations, making for an even smoother migration.
  1. Study known Struts 1 applications, rewritten for Struts 2 - Familiar applications such as the Struts Mailreader are being rewritten to demonstrate best practices for Struts 2.
  2. Use a conversion wizard - It may be possible to create a tool that reads the web.xml and S1 configuration files, and generates the corresponding S2 classes, pages, and configuration files. While 100% compatibility is unlikely, we could make a strong effort to convert the application, marking areas that need attention. Comparing the converted files with the originals could also serve as a training tool.


Key Changes From WebWork 2
The upgrade path from WebWork 2 to Struts 2 is smooth glide. Here's the roadmap.
System Platform
  • Struts 2 is dependant on XWork 2 (beta-1).
  • Java 1.5 is required to build Struts 2.
    • For Java 1.4 deployments, RetroTranslater JARS are available with the distribution.
For other changes from WebWork 2, see the "Members to rename", "New property settings", "New features or feature changes", and "Removed or deprecated" sections.
Members to rename
WebWork 2
Struts 2
com.opensymphony.xwork.*
com.opensymphony.xwork2.*
com.opensymphony.webwork.*
org.apache.struts2.*
xwork.xml
struts.xml
webwork.properties
struts.properties
DispatcherUtil
Dispatcher
com.opensymphony.webwork.config.Configuration
org.apache.struts2.config.Settings
The tag prefix conventions in the example applications have changed.
JSP
s:
<s:form ...>
Freemarker
s.
<@s.form ...>
Velocity
s
#sform ( ... )

New property settings
struts.enable.DynamicMethodInvocation
Enable support for the hardwired action!alias syntax (Default is TRUE).
It is recommended that all applications specify the DynamicMethodInvocation setting for now, since the default may change. The recommended approach to action aliasing is to use wildcard aliases instead of the hardwired bang.
New features and feature changes
·                     Various changes to ConfigurationManager
o    ConfigurationManager is no longer a static factory. It is now an instance created through Dispatcher. Custom configuration could be done through DispatcherListener.
o    Custom configuration to ConfigurationManager and Configuration cannot be done statically anymore, instead use Dispatcher's DispatcherListener to achieve the same effect.
o    The prepare interceptor now uses reflection to call prepare_Method_ where method is the action method configured for the particular action in struts.xml.
// with the above configuration, and PrepareInterceptor in play, callsequence will be
1] prepareInsert() (If it exists)
2] prepare() (Unless Interceptor's alwaysInvokePrepare parameter
   is set to false)
3] insert()
o    DefaultWorkflowInterceptor (named workflow in struts-default.xml) now uses reflection to call validateMethod on the action class that implements Validateable interface where method is the action method configured for the particular action in struts.xml.
·         <action name="myAction" method="insert" ...>
·                ...
    </action>
// with the above configuration, and DefaultWorkflowInterceptor in play, 
//call sequence for action that implements Validateable interface will be
1] validateInsert()
2] validate() (unless Interceptor's alwaysInvokeValidate parameter
   is set to false)
3] insert()
  • The tooltip library used by the xhtml theme was replaced by Dojo's tooltip component.
  • Datepicker tag has been renamed to datetimepicker and is now using dojo (limited in terms functionality and internationalization)
  • Tiles integration plugin is available.
  • Wildcards can be specified in action mappings.
  • MessageStoreInterceptor is introduced to allow field errors / action errors and messages to be store and retrieve through session, resulting them to be preservable across request.

Removed or deprecated
AroundInterceptor
The AroundInterceptor has been removed. If your application extends the AroundInterceptor, either import the class into your source code form WebWork 2 (pursuant to the Open Symphony License) and modify it to server as your own base class, or rewrite your interceptor.
oldSyntax
Support for the "oldSyntax" is removed.
Rich text editor tag
Rich text editor tag is removed and replaced by Dojo's rich text editor
doActionMethod
The convention of trying a "do" form of an action method is not supported.
<action name="..." method="submit">
    ...
  </action>
In WebWork,
  • try to execute submit method in the action, fail
  • try to execute doSubmit method in the action if Step 1, fail
  • fail
    In Struts,
  • try to execute submit method in the action, fail
  • fail
default method
Calling the "default" method via "doDefault" is not supported.
IOC framework
Deprecated in WebWork 2.2, the internal IOC framework is removed in Struts 2. Spring is the ObjectFactory default.


Ref: 


Popular Posts

Blog Archive