Struts 2: trying to
combine the stability and accessibility of Struts 1 with the elegant
architecture of WebWork 2. Since the initial incubation, the Struts 2 code has
added major features including a plugin framework, a new API, and better Ajax
tags..
Comparing Struts 1 and 2
Feature
|
Struts 1
|
Struts 2
|
Action classes
|
Struts 1 requires Action classes
to extend an abstract base class. A common problem in Struts 1 is programming
to abstract classes instead of interfaces.
|
An Struts 2 Action may implement
an Action interface, along with other interfaces to enable optional
and custom services. Struts 2 provides a base ActionSupport class to
implement commonly used interfaces. Albeit, the Action interface is not required.
Any POJO object with a execute signature can be used as an Struts 2
Action object.
|
Threading Model
|
Struts 1 Actions are singletons
and must be thread-safe since there will only be one instance of a class to
handle all requests for that Action. The singleton strategy places
restrictions on what can be done with Struts 1 Actions and requires extra
care to develop. Action resources must be thread-safe or synchronized.
|
Struts 2 Action objects are
instantiated for each request, so there are no thread-safety issues. (In
practice, servlet containers generate many throw-away objects per request,
and one more object does not impose a performance penalty or impact garbage
collection.)
|
Servlet Dependency
|
Struts 1 Actions have dependencies
on the servlet API since the HttpServletRequest and HttpServletResponse is
passed to the execute method when an Action is invoked.
|
Struts 2 Actions are not coupled
to a container. Most often the servlet contexts are represented as simple
Maps, allowing Actions to be tested in isolation. Struts 2 Actions can still
access the original request and response, if required. However, other
architectural elements reduce or eliminate the need to access the
HttpServetRequest or HttpServletResponse directly.
|
Testability
|
A major hurdle to testing Struts 1
Actions is that the execute method exposes the Servlet API. A
third-party extension, Struts TestCase, offers a set of mock object for
Struts 1.
|
Struts 2 Actions can be tested by
instantiating the Action, setting properties, and invoking methods.
Dependency Injection support also makes testing simpler.
|
Harvesting Input
|
Struts 1 uses an ActionForm object
to capture input. Like Actions, all ActionForms must extend a base class.
Since other JavaBeans cannot be used as ActionForms, developers often
create redundant classes to capture input. DynaBeans can used as an alternative
to creating conventional ActionForm classes, but, here too, developers may be
redescribing existing JavaBeans.
|
Struts 2 uses Action properties as
input properties, eliminating the need for a second input object. Input
properties may be rich object types which may have their own properties. The
Action properties can be accessed from the web page via the taglibs. Struts 2
also supports the ActionForm pattern, as well as POJO form objects and POJO
Actions. Rich object types, including business or domain objects, can be used
as input/output objects. The ModelDriven feature simplifies taglb references
to POJO input objects.
|
Expression Language
|
Struts 1 integrates with JSTL, so
it uses the JSTL EL. The EL has basic object graph traversal, but relatively
weak collection and indexed property support.
|
Struts 2 can use JSTL, but the
framework also supports a more powerful and flexible expression language
called "Object Graph Notation Language" (OGNL).
|
Binding values into views
|
Struts 1 uses the standard JSP
mechanism for binding objects into the page context for access.
|
Struts 2 uses a
"ValueStack" technology so that the taglibs can access values
without coupling your view to the object type it is rendering. The ValueStack
strategy allows reuse of views across a range of types which may have the
same property name but different property types.
|
Type Conversion
|
Struts 1 ActionForm properties are
usually all Strings. Struts 1 uses Commons-Beanutils for type conversion.
Converters are per-class, and not configurable per instance.
|
Struts 2 uses OGNL for type
conversion. The framework includes converters for basic and common object
types and primitives.
|
Validation
|
Struts 1 supports manual
validation via a validate method on the ActionForm, or through an
extension to the Commons Validator. Classes can have different validation
contexts for the same class, but cannot chain to validations on sub-objects.
|
Struts 2 supports manual
validation via the validate method and the XWork Validation
framework. The Xwork Validation Framework supports chaining validation into
sub-properties using the validations defined for the properties class type
and the validation context.
|
Control Of Action Execution
|
Struts 1 supports separate Request
Processors (lifecycles) for each module, but all the Actions in the module
must share the same lifecycle.
|
Struts 2 supports creating
different lifecycles on a per Action basis via Interceptor Stacks. Custom
stacks can be created and used with different Actions, as needed.
|
Migration Strategies
The migration strategy of Struts 1 developers moving to Struts 2 involves four non-exclusive paths:
The migration strategy of Struts 1 developers moving to Struts 2 involves four non-exclusive paths:
1. Dual
processor, shared resources - Add the Struts 2.0 JARs to your exisitng
Struts 1.3 application. Configure S2 to handle *.action requests s
and
let S1 handle *.do requests.
S1 and S2 can run side by side, within the same web application. Teams can implement new features in the latest version, and migrate older pieces as needed. Optionally, some common resources may be shared between S1 and S2, like messages, validation rules, and Tiles configurations, making for an even smoother migration.
let S1 handle *.do requests.
S1 and S2 can run side by side, within the same web application. Teams can implement new features in the latest version, and migrate older pieces as needed. Optionally, some common resources may be shared between S1 and S2, like messages, validation rules, and Tiles configurations, making for an even smoother migration.
- Study known Struts 1 applications, rewritten for Struts
2 - Familiar applications
such as the Struts Mailreader are being rewritten to demonstrate best
practices for Struts 2.
- Use a conversion wizard - It may be possible to create a tool that reads
the web.xml and S1 configuration files, and generates the
corresponding S2 classes, pages, and configuration files. While 100%
compatibility is unlikely, we could make a strong effort to convert the
application, marking areas that need attention. Comparing the converted
files with the originals could also serve as a training tool.
Key Changes From WebWork 2
The upgrade path from WebWork 2 to Struts 2 is smooth glide. Here's the roadmap.
The upgrade path from WebWork 2 to Struts 2 is smooth glide. Here's the roadmap.
- Struts 2 is dependant on XWork 2 (beta-1).
- Java 1.5 is required to build Struts 2.
- For Java 1.4 deployments, RetroTranslater JARS are
available with the distribution.
For other changes from
WebWork 2, see the "Members to rename", "New property
settings", "New features or feature changes", and "Removed
or deprecated" sections.
WebWork 2
|
Struts 2
|
com.opensymphony.xwork.*
|
com.opensymphony.xwork2.*
|
com.opensymphony.webwork.*
|
org.apache.struts2.*
|
xwork.xml
|
struts.xml
|
webwork.properties
|
struts.properties
|
DispatcherUtil
|
Dispatcher
|
com.opensymphony.webwork.config.Configuration
|
org.apache.struts2.config.Settings
|
The tag prefix
conventions in the example applications have changed.
JSP
|
s:
|
<s:form ...>
|
Freemarker
|
s.
|
<@s.form ...>
|
Velocity
|
s
|
#sform ( ... )
|
New property settings
struts.enable.DynamicMethodInvocation
|
Enable support for the
hardwired action!alias syntax (Default is TRUE).
It is recommended that all applications specify the DynamicMethodInvocation setting for now, since the default may change. The recommended approach to action aliasing is to use wildcard aliases instead of the hardwired bang. |
|
· Various
changes to ConfigurationManager
o ConfigurationManager is no longer a static
factory. It is now an instance created through Dispatcher. Custom configuration
could be done through DispatcherListener.
o Custom configuration to ConfigurationManager and
Configuration cannot be done statically anymore, instead use Dispatcher's
DispatcherListener to achieve the same effect.
o The prepare interceptor now uses
reflection to call prepare_Method_ where method is the action
method configured for the particular action in struts.xml.
// with the above configuration, and
PrepareInterceptor in play, callsequence will be
1] prepareInsert() (If it exists)
2] prepare() (Unless Interceptor's
alwaysInvokePrepare parameter
is set to false)
3] insert()
o DefaultWorkflowInterceptor (named workflow in struts-default.xml)
now uses reflection to call validateMethod on the action class that
implements Validateable interface where method is the action method
configured for the particular action in struts.xml.
· <action
name="myAction" method="insert" ...>
· ...
</action>
// with the above configuration, and
DefaultWorkflowInterceptor in play,
//call sequence for action that implements
Validateable interface will be
1] validateInsert()
2] validate() (unless Interceptor's
alwaysInvokeValidate parameter
is set to false)
3] insert()
- The tooltip library used by the xhtml theme was
replaced by Dojo's tooltip component.
- Datepicker tag has been renamed to datetimepicker and
is now using dojo (limited in terms functionality and
internationalization)
- Tiles integration plugin
is available.
- Wildcards can be specified in action
mappings.
- MessageStoreInterceptor is
introduced to allow field errors / action errors and messages to be store
and retrieve through session, resulting them to be preservable across
request.
AroundInterceptor
|
The AroundInterceptor has been
removed. If your application extends the AroundInterceptor, either import the
class into your source code form WebWork 2 (pursuant to the Open Symphony
License) and modify it to server as your own base class, or rewrite your interceptor.
|
oldSyntax
|
Support for the
"oldSyntax" is removed.
|
Rich text editor tag
|
Rich text editor tag is removed
and replaced by Dojo's rich
text editor
|
doActionMethod
|
The convention of trying a
"do" form of an action method is not supported.
<action name="..."
method="submit">
...
</action>
In WebWork,
|
default method
|
Calling the "default"
method via "doDefault" is not supported.
|
IOC framework
|
Deprecated in WebWork 2.2, the
internal IOC framework is removed in Struts 2. Spring is the ObjectFactory default.
|
Ref:
0 comments:
Post a Comment